|
4741 REVIEW DENIED Since a state employee could have begun a whistleblower retaliation proceeding without filling out the form supplied by the employer titled, "UCLA Whistleblower Retaliation Complaint Form," confidentiality provisions in the form did not violate the employee's constitutional right to free speech; the employer's failure to inform employees that use of the form was not mandatory could be a consideration should uncertainty about the form result in a delay in instituting the proceeding.CitationJONES v REGENTS OF UC (Whistleblower Confidentiality) 164 CA4 1072 [See: GovC 8547 etseq, 8547.10; Campbell v Regents 35 C4 311, P/AT 5/05]
|
|
