|
P1282 A preliminary conversation with an attorney, which does not result in retention, does not result in a presumption that confidential information was acquired, so a person with whom that conversation took place who seeks to have the attorney disqualified from representing an adversary in a subsequent case has the burden of showing that the attorney actually did acquire confidential information that would result in a conflict.CitationMED-TRANS v CITY OF CALIFORNIA CITY (Attorney Disqualification) 156 CA4 655 [See: CCP 128; Rules of PC 3-310; Faughn v Perez 145 CA4 592, P/AT 1/07; Peo exrel Dept of Corps v SpeeDee 20 C4 1135]
|
|
