4623 Alleged defamation contained in an oral history of which only ten copies were made, that appeared in only three libraries, and that was not available on the internet is subject, never-the-less, to the single publication rule, so the statute of limitations on tort actions arising from it begins to run on the first publication; if it was not published in an inherently secretive manner and was available to the public, the delayed discovery rule does not apply even though it was not widely distributed.CitationHEBREW ACADEMY v GOLDMAN (Oral History) 42 C4 883 [See: CCP 340; CivC 3425.3; Shively v Bozanich, 31 C4 1230, T/AT 1/04; Hebrew Academy v Goldman (RevGrtd) 129 CA4 391, T/AT 6/05]
|
|