|
4688 REVIEW DENIED A mobile home park's practice of refusing to rent spaces to plaintiff for the sale of its mobile homes while renting them to other mobile home dealers who allegedly paid a consideration for the exclusive privilege was not an illegal tying arrangement under the Cartwright Act, because it did not prevent plaintiff from selling, or purchasers from buying, plaintiff's mobile homes and installing them in the park.CitationSC MANUFACTURED HOMES v LIEBERT (Mobilehome Tying) 161 CA4 1275 [See: B&PC 16700 etseq; Fisherman's Wharf Bay Cruise v Superior Court 114 CA4 309, T/AT 1/04; Belton v Comcast 151 CA4 1224, T/AT 8/07]
|
|
