Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
P1376 REVIEW DENIED In an action based on the claim that defendant failed to return equipment it rented from plaintiff, the jury's awards of $15,000 for rental value and $30,000 for the value of the equipment were inconsistent, making the verdict hopelessly ambiguous; the trial court's entry of judgment for $30,000 was therefore reversed.CitationZAGAMI v CRONE (Hopeless Ambiguity) 160 CA4 1083 [See: CCP 619; CivC 3543; Woodcock v Fontana 69 C2 452] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||