|
4730 REVIEW DENIED The driver of a Los Angeles police car responding to a Code 2 call has a duty to obey traffic laws; the deposition of a person now residing more than 150 miles from the court is admissible without a showing of the deponent's unavailability; a trial court may not use its inherent power to control the conduct of proceedings before it to limit the admission of cumulative expert testimony.CitationMONROY v CITY OF LA (Emergency Response) 164 CA4 248 [See: VehC 21055; CCP 2025.620; City of Sacramento v Superior Court 131 CA3 395; Topanga v Gentile 249 CA2 681]
|
