|
4678 REVIEW DENIED In the absence of specific misrepresentations of fact, knowledge by defendant that it was making such misrepresentations, and the intent to defraud, a breach of contract does not qualify as the subject of a fraud action; ordinarily, termination of a business relationship is not sufficiently outrageous to result in liability for intentional infliction of emotional distress.CitationUNTERBERGER v RED BULL (Contract Masquerade) 162 CA4 414 [See: Erlich v Menezes 21 C4 543, T/AT 9/99; Fowler v Varian 196 CA3 34]
|
|
