|
4780 REVIEW DENIED A moratorium on building that completely deprived realty owners of all economically beneficial use of their properties was a taking that required just compensation unless principles of nuisance would independently restrict the owners' intended use of the property; the mere possibility of future damage does not constitute a nuisance.CitationMONKS v CITY OF RANCHO PALOS VERDES (Inverse Condemnation) 167 CA4 263 [See: CA Const I, 19; Action Ap't v SM Rent Control 94 CA4 587; Lucas v SC Coastal 505 US 1003; Lingle v Chevron 544 US 528]
|
|
