Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
0753 Under the doctrine of collateral estoppel, a juvenile court's finding that the insured's teenaged son wilfully injured the claimant by shooting him repeatedly with a .38 pistol at close range justified the conclusion that a policy exclusion for expected or intended injuries relieved the insurer of a duty to defend or indemnify.CitationWESTERN v YAMAMOTO (Juvenile Estoppel) 29 CA4 1474 [See: InsC 533; Clemmer v Hartford 22 C3 865] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||