|
0548 Plaintiff's fear of a future catastrophe resulting from defendant's storage of airplane fuel did not justify a private action for public nuisance because it was not different in kind from the fear experienced by the general public, and did not justify an action for private nuisance because fear of future harm is not a substantial invasion of the right to use and enjoy realty.CitationKOLL-IRVINE v COUNTY (Fuel Farm) 24 CA4 1036 [See: Brown v Arbuckle 88 CA2 258; Helix v City 82 CA3 932; County v Carlstrom 196 CA2 485]
|
|
