Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
0600 Even though defendant used advertising to sell acid washed jeans allegedly manufactured by infringing on plaintiff's patent, plaintiff's suit for patent infringement was not a suit for advertising injury, and therefore was not covered by a policy insuring against liability for advertising injury.CitationGITANO v KEMPER (Acid Washed Jeans) 26 CA4 49 [See: CivC 1646; Bank of the West v SuperCt 2 C4 1254, T/AT 9/92] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||