Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
0588 An FCC hearing to determine which of two applicants should be licensed to operate on a particular frequency is not a proceeding against either applicant, and so cannot be the basis of malicious prosecution liability.CitationSTOLZ v WONG (Same Frequency) 25 CA4 1811 [See: 47 USC 301 etseq; Ashbacker v FCC 326 US 327; Sheldon Appel v Albert & Oliker 47 C3 863] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||