|
0689 Under an insurance agreement providing coverage for an occurrence or accident resulting in unexpected and unintended damage, the Joint Powers Insurance Authority was not required to defend a lawsuit based on the claim that the insured city deliberately interfered with plaintiff's constitutional rights and economic advantage by passing an anti-noise ordinance designed to put plaintiff out of business.CitationCITY v SC JOINT POWERS INS AUTH (Anti-Noise) 28 CA4 701 [See: InsC 533; Devin v United 6 CA4 1149; Giddings v Industrial 112 CA3 213; Montrose v SuperCt 6 C4 287, T/AT 1/94; Dykstra v Foremost 14 CA4 361, T/AT 5/93]
|
|
