- Home
- Bios
- Try Us Free
- Subscribe
- Case Library
- CA Evidence
 Discovery
 Civ-Pro
- Torts
- SLAPPS
- Text Summaries
- Search
- Support
| Case Summary | |
| 0583 The operator of a swap meet at which vendors rented stalls for the sale of goods to the public did not owe tenant-vendors a duty to protect their merchandise against theft.CitationROTMAN v MACLIN (Swap Meet) 24 CA4 1709 [See: Royal Neckware v Century City 205 CA3 1146] | |
|  | |||||
|  | |||||
| Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes) | |||||
| Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022 | |||||