Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
0583 The operator of a swap meet at which vendors rented stalls for the sale of goods to the public did not owe tenant-vendors a duty to protect their merchandise against theft.CitationROTMAN v MACLIN (Swap Meet) 24 CA4 1709 [See: Royal Neckware v Century City 205 CA3 1146] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||