Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
0699 Unless defendants knew or should have known that Lyme-disease-carrying ticks were in the area, they had no duty to warn plaintiff about the risk of Lyme disease before allowing their dog to sit on plaintiff's lap.CitationBUTCHER v GAY (Lyme Disease) 29 CA4 388 [See: Brunelle v Signore 215 CA3 122; Rowland v Christian 69 C2 108] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||