Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
0565 A contractor's act of cutting holes in a roof in conformity with erroneous plans and drawings was not an "occurrence" as defined by a policy providing coverage for property damage, and so the expense of resizing the holes was not "property damage" under the policy.CitationOVERLAND v MARYLAND CAS (Wrong Size) 24 CA4 1491 [See: United v McGuire 229 CA3 1560] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||