Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
0547 REVIEW GRANTED A landholder who refused to rent to an unmarried couple because of her religious belief that sex outside of marriage is a sin and that if she rented to an unmarried couple she would be a participant in their sin was not liable for discrimination on the basis of marital status under FEHA.CitationSMITH v CFEH (Unmarried Couple) 25 CA4 251 [See: GovC 12900; Employment Division v Smith 494 US 872] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||