Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
0423 If a nuisance can be abated, it is a continuing nuisance, and the statute of limitations does not begin to run until it is actually abated; the occupier of land can maintain a nuisance action against a prior occupier who contaminated the soil.CitationWILSHIRE v ARCO (Ground Contamination) 20 CA4 732 [See: Capogeannis v SuperCt 12 CA4 668; Newhall v SuperCt 19 CA4 334; Mangini v Aerojet 230 CA3 1125; CCP 338(b)] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||