|
0582 REVIEW GRANTED There was sufficient evidence to support a jury's verdict that a landlord's failure to provide security was a proximate cause of the attack and rape of a tenant in the building's underground parking lot, but the jury's apportionment of 95% of the fault to the landlord and only 4% and 1% to the rapist and his accomplice was unsupported by the evidence and required a new trial on the issue of apportionment of fault.CitationPAMELA B v HAYDEN (Parking Lot Rape) 30 CA4 1063 [See: Ann M v Pacific Plaza 6 C4 666; Nola M v USC 16 CA4 421; CCP 1431.2]
|
|
