Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
0593 Plaintiff's awareness that she was experiencing memory lapses associated with electro-shock treatments was sufficient to begin running of the statute of limitations on her action against the practitioner administering the treatments, even though plaintiff was not aware that the memory losses resulted from a stroke caused by the treatments.CitationMCNALL v SUMMERS (Shock Therapy) 25 CA4 1300 [See: CCP 340.5; Dolan v Borelli 13 CA4 816, T/AT 4/94; Steingart v White 198 CA3 406] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||