Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
0500 Employment without a specified term is presumed to be at will, and evidence tending to rebut that presumption raises a question of fact.CitationHAYCOCK v HUGHES (At Will Employment) 22 CA4 1473 [See: LabC 2922; EvC 115, 606] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||