Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
0637 During deliberations, a juror's statement about what his brother-in-law earned in an occupation similar to the one plaintiff hoped to pursue was not misconduct sufficient to impeach the verdict unless other jurors treated the statement as evidence.CitationENGLISH v LIN (Brother-in-Law's Salary) 26 CA4 1358 [See: Mesecher v County 9 CA4 1677, T/AT 12/92] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||