|
0647 Public entities and their employees are not immune from liability for non-discretionary acts, and conduct mandated by statute, rule, or regulation is non-discretionary; a jury's patently improper apportionment of fault (i.e., 1% to a person who intentionally injured the plaintiff, and 99% to a public entity that failed to supervise that person) should be reversed and remanded for re-trial on the issue of apportionment only.CitationSCOTT v COUNTY (Non-Visitation) 27 CA4 125 [See: GovC 815.2, 815.6, 820.2, 821.6; CCP 1431.2; DSS Reg 30-342; Johnson v State 69 C2 782; Weidenfeller v Star & Garter 1 CA4 1; Pamela B v Hayden 25 CA4 785, T/AT 7/94; Rosh v Cave 27 CA4 125, T/AT 8/94]
|
|
