|
0499 Although the California Supreme Court's decision in Neary requires the Court of Appeal to grant a request for stipulated reversal in the absence of extraordinary circumstances, a statute authorizing the Real Estate Commissioner to discipline a real estate licensee against whom a judgment for fraud is obtained is a sufficiently extraordinary circumstance to justify denial of a request for stipulated reversal of a judgment for fraud against a real estate licensee.CitationKRUG v PRASZKER (Stipulated Reversal) 22 CA4 1814 [See: Lucich v City 19 CA4 494, T/AT 11/93; Neary v Regents 3 C4 273, T/AT 10/92]
|
|
