0687 In an action for credit discrimination, once plaintiff established an inference that the denial of credit was based on race discrimination, defendant had the burden of proving a non-discriminatory reason for denying credit to plaintiff, and the jury's conclusion that defendant's explanation was a pretext correctly resulted in judgment for plaintiff, even though the jury did not believe that defendant's conduct was motivated by race discrimination.CitationGREEN v RANCHO (Hot Potato) 28 CA4 686 [See: Barber v Rancho 26 CA4 1819, T/AT 9/94]
|
|