|
0553 A dance studio is not liable under the theory of respondeat superior for the conduct of an employee - dance instructor, who sexually molested a teen-aged student at the studio; the statute extending the period of limitations for actions based on sexual abuse of children does not apply to an action against an abuser's employer for negligently employing the abuser.CitationDEBBIE REYNOLDS STUDIOS v SUPERIOR COURT (Respondeat Abuser) 25 CA4 222 [See: CCP 340.1; Clark v Wheat 92 CA3 503; Rodgers v Kemper 50 CA3 608]
|
|
