Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
0612 Trial court should not have issued a sanction precluding the use of evidence because it was obtained by plaintiff's attorney as the result of a third person's violation of a protective order issued in another case.CitationMcGINTY v SUPERIOR COURT (Evidence Sanction) 26 CA4 204 [See: Aerojet v Transport 18 CA4 996, T/AT 11/93] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||