- Home
- Bios
- Try Us Free
- Subscribe
- Case Library
- CA Evidence
Discovery
Civ-Pro - Torts
- SLAPPS
- Text Summaries
- Search
- Support
Case Summary |
|
0411 In determining the existence of a duty of reasonable care, the foreseeability of the risk is a question for the court and should be balanced against the burden of avoiding the risk; in the absence of prior similar incidents, a mall owner has no duty to provide security patrols to protect tenants' employees against attack by third persons.CitationANN M v PACIFIC PLAZA (Mall Attack) 6 C4 666 [See: Isaacs v Huntington Mem 38 C3 112] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||