|
0744 A public entity has no duty to defend or indemnify an employee who is sued for acts which, although alleged to be in the scope of employment, were actually not; a police officer was not acting within the scope of employment when he had sexual contact with a civilian informant in the officer's home, while on vacation, and without coercing her by abusing his authority as an officer.CitationSD POLICE v CITY (Off Duty Sex) 29 CA4 1736 [See: Alma W v Oakland USD 123 CA3 133; Mary M v City 54 C3 202; White v County 166 CA3 566; Perez v Van Groningen 41 C3 962; GovC 995]
|
|
