Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
0643 In a malpractice action against an attorney based on the attorney's failure to take prompt action to secure the evidence, the client had the burden of proving that the value of his claim was reduced as a result of the attorney's conduct.CitationTHOMAS v LUSK (Broken Hammer) 27 CA4 1709 [See: Haft v Lone Palm 3 C3 756; McGee v Cessna 139 CA3 179] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||