Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
P1256 REVIEW DENIED An action against plaintiff's former attorney based on the claim he violated attorney-client duties by handling litigation for a party with interests adverse to plaintiff's was triggered by the attorney's petitioning activity, but did not arise from it, so the SLAPP statute does not apply.CitationFREEMAN v SCHACK (Conflict SLAPP) 154 CA4 719 [See: CCP 425.16; Martinez v Metabolife 113 CA4 181, P/AT 1/04] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||