|
4394 REVIEW DENIED Under CGL policies in issue, "occurrence" was held to mean injurious exposure to asbestos, but although not all asbestos exposures in the thousands of product liability claims asserted against the insured should be treated as a single occurrence, the factual record was too limited to permit any judgment about how many of those claims resulted from a single occurrence.CitationLONDON MARKET INSURERS v SUPERIOR COURT (Asbestos Occurrence) 146 CA4 648 [See: TRB v Fireman's Fund 40 C4 19, T/AT 12/06]
|
|
