Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
P1251 Because a previous 11 day continuance was not caused by courtroom unavailability, a 318 day continuance that was caused by courtroom unavailability and that resulted in delaying the trial date beyond five years after the complaint was filed did not make trial within the statutory period impracticable and did not toll running of the time period.CitationDE SANTIAGO v D&G PLUMBING (Congestion Delay) 155 CA4 365 [See: CCP 583.310, 583.360; Tamburina v Combined 147 CA4 323, P/AT 3/07] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||