|
4380 REVIEW DENIED After finding that an attorney malpractice action had been brought without probable cause, the court concluded that dismissal of the malpractice case as a terminating discovery sanction for failure of the plaintiff in that action to comply with discovery orders was a final termination on the merits that supported a subsequent claim for malicious prosecution against the person who had brought the malpractice action.CitationROSS v KISH (Final Termination) 145 CA4 188 [See: Jarrow v LaMarche 31 C4 728, P/AT 9/03; Zamos v Stroud 32 C4 958, T/AT 5/04; Eells v Rosenblum 36 CA4 1848, T/AT 9/95; Swat-Fame v Goldstein 101 CA4 613, T/AT 10/02; Downey Venture v LMI 66 CA4 478, T/AT 10/98]
|
|
