- Home
- Bios
- Try Us Free
- Subscribe
- Case Library
- CA Evidence
Discovery
Civ-Pro - Torts
- SLAPPS
- Text Summaries
- Search
- Support
Case Summary |
|
4589 The role played by an insurer in lobbying for passage of a law regarding contribution between primary and excess insurers that cover the same loss is not relevant to a challenge based on an alleged violation of equal protection in the absence of a showing that the law treated the challenger differently than other similarly situated insurers.CitationMERCURY v SCOTTSDALE (Insurance Lobbying) 156 CA4 1212 [See: InsC 11580.9(g)] |
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||