Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
P1146 A trial court did not abuse its discretion in coming to the conclusion that a lapse of five or six days cast serious doubt about whether a public record was made close enough to the time of the test it recorded to be deemed trustworthy, and that it was not admissible under the public records exception to the hearsay rule.CitationGLATMAN v VALVERDE (Public Records) 146 CA4 700 [See: EvC 1280; People v Martinez 22 C4 106] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||