|
4378 REVIEW DENIED In view of evidence that, at a senior apartment complex represented to be a secured and controlled access community with locked entry gate and building doors, vagrants regularly entered, showered at the pool, and slept on benches there, and that an attacker who raped a resident previously had entered the building more than 19 times, had been getting progressively aggressive in panhandling, and that before the attack the victim and other residents complained to management that he scared them and that doors were not locking, there were triable issues regarding the landlord's duty to protect the victim and regarding proximate cause that should have prevented entry of summary judgment for the landlord.CitationAMBRIZ v KELEGIAN (Senior Complex Intrusion) 146 CA4 1519 [See: KFC v Superior Court 14 C4 814, T/AT 2/97; Saelzler v Advanced 25 C4 763, T/AT 6/01; Leslie G v Perry 43 CA4 472, T/AT 4/96]
|
|
