|
4568 REVIEW DENIED Employees of a public entity ordinarily owe a plaintiff no duty to report suspicions of a co-empoyee’s drug use to prevent the co-employee from committing a crime against plaintiff; no action may be brought against a public entity for negligent hiring and supervision; a federal regulation requiring licensed handlers of certain toxins to maintain effective safeguards to prevent theft is not sufficiently specific to impose a mandatory duty on a public entity licensed to handle those toxins.Citationde VILLERS v COUNTY OF SD (Murder by Toxin) 156 CA4 238 [See: GovC 815.2, 815.6; 21 CFR 1301.71; Eastburn v Regional Fire 31 C4 1175, T/AT 1/04; Munoz v City 120 CA4 1077, T/AT 8/04]
|
|
