|
P1236 The SLAPP statute did not apply to an action for breach of contract and fraud based on the claim that defendant promised to arrange street access for certain realty it sold, but filed permit applications that had the opposite effect, because defendant's petitioning activities in submitting permit applications were only incidental to the claim, and the claim did not arise from them.CitationWANG v WAL-MART REAL ESTATE (Incidental Petition) 153 CA4 790 [See: CCP 425.16; Kajima v City 95 CA4 921, P/AT 3/02; Navellier v Sletten 29 C4 82, T/AT 10/02]
|
|
