Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
4562 When an attorney leaves a law firm but continues representing a client that s/he represented while at the firm, the statute of limitations on the client's action against the firm for attorney malpractice is not tolled.CitationBEAL BANK v ARTER & HADDEN (Continuing Representation) 42 C4 503 [See: CCP 340.6; Crouse v Brobeck 67 CA4 1509, T/AT 1/99; Beane v Paulsen 21 CA4 89, T/AT 2/94; Beal Bank v Arter & Hadden (RevGrtd) 135 CA4 643, T/AT 2/06] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||