|
P1132 An action for breach of contract allegedly committed when defendant opposed plaintiff's hotel expansion plans after promising not to did not arise from statements made in the course of defendant's promotion of its goods and services, or in the course of delivering goods and services, so it was not excluded from operation of the SLAPP statute by a recent amendment that creates exceptions to it.CitationSUNSET v LHO (Hotel Expansion) 146 CA4 300 [See: CCP 425.16, 425.17; Brill v TCW 132 CA4 324, P/AT 11/05]
|
|
