4499 REVIEW DENIED Although a company purchased, at a discounted rate, medical liens against a plaintiff's recovery in an action against the tortfeasor responsible for the injury that required treatment, plaintiff was entitled to present evidence of the full amount of the liens and to receive the full amount as damage, because plaintiff remained liable to the lienors' assignee for the full amount.CitationKATIUZHINSKY v PERRY (Discounted Liens) 152 CA4 1288 [See: Helfend v SCRTD 2 C3 1; Hanif v Housing 200 CA3 635; Nishihama v City 93 CA4 298, T/AT 12/01; Parnell v Adventist 35 C4 595, T/AT 5/05; Greer v Buzgheia 141 CA4 1150, T/AT 10/06]
|
|