4369 REVIEW DENIED In selling an automobile model with knowledge that an engine part would wear out after expiration of the express warranty period, the manufacturer did not breach the express warranty, and did not violate the federal Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act, California's Consumer Legal Remedies Act, or California's Unfair Competition Law.CitationDAUGHERTY v AMERICAN HONDA (Latent Defect) 144 CA4 824 [See: B&PC 17200 etseq; CivC 1770 etseq; 15 USC 2301 etseq; Cel-Tech v LA Cellular 20 C4 163, T/AT 5/99; Abraham v Volkswagen 795 F2 238; Bardin v DaimlerChrysler 136 CA4 1255, T/AT 3/06]
|
|