|
4372 REVIEW GRANTED Allegations that plaintiff's work supervisor sometimes gave every subordinate except plaintiff a gift; required plaintiff to document her phone calls; required plaintiff to cover phones during the office Christmas party; often snubbed plaintiff at staff meetings and did not return her "good morning" greetings; once made a throat slash gesture when plaintiff was on the phone and then loudly reprimanded her in front of coworkers; referred to plaintiff job as a "no-brainer;" told plaintiff that her heavy sweating was "disgusting;" told plaintiff to bathe and shower more often; and once left soaps, shampoos and deodorants on plaintiff's desk, all causing plaintiff to feel crushed, were not sufficient to result in liability for harassment.CitationROBY v McKESSON (Boorish Supervisor) 146 CA4 63 [See: GovC 12900 etseq; Reno v Baird 18 C4 640, T/AT 9/98; Miller v Dep't of Corrections 36 C4 446, T/AT 8/05]
|
|
