4489 REVIEW GRANTED Plaintiffs who alleged that a phone service provider's contract contained illegal and unconscionable terms, but did not allege that this resulted in plaintiffs' being required to pay any money out of their own pockets, or to lose money or property, or to be denied any money that is rightfully theirs, lack standing to sue either under the Unfair Competition Law or the Consumer Legal Remedies Act.CitationMEYER v SPRINT (UCL Standing) 150 CA4 1136 [See: B&PC 17200 etseq; CivC 1750 etseq; Aron v U-Haul 143 CA4 796, T/AT 11/06; Huntingdon v Stop Huntingdon 129 CA4 1228, T/AT 7/05; Progressive v Superior Court 135 CA4 263, T/AT 1/06]
|
|