|
4371 REVIEW DENIED Although facially valid, a section of the Consumer Credit Reporting Agencies Act giving consumers the right to place a security freeze on their credit reports that prohibits consumer credit reporting agencies from releasing credit information to third parties without prior express authorization swept too broadly in preventing a credit reporting agency from truthfully reporting information contained in public records and so its enforcement against that agency was enjoined.CitationUD REGISTRY v STATE OF CALIFORNIA (Security Freeze) 144 CA4 405 [See: CivC 1785.11.2; Schoendorf v UD Registry 97 CA4 227, T/AT 5/02; Decker v UD Registry 105 CA4 1382, P/AT 3/03; UD Registry v State 34 CA4 107; Kasky v Nike 27 C4 939, T/AT 6/02; Central Hudson v PSC 447 US 557]
|
|
