|
0367 DEPUBLISHED Evidence of a continuing pattern of unfair treatment of an employee who belongs to a protected minority is circumstantial evidence that discriminatory acts were motivated by animus for members of the protected group and permits, although it does not require, an inference of intentional discrimination.CitationHARRIS v HUGHES AIRCRAFT (Evidence Of Discrimination) 19 CA4 129 [See: GovC 12900 etseq; 42 U.S.C. 2000e etseq; McDonnell Douglas v Green 411 US 792; St. Mary's v Hicks 125 LEd2 407]
|
|
