Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
0357 In view of the fact that their twenty-four year old son had never acted irresponsibly with a firearm, parents did not owe third person a duty to control their son's behavior or to warn of his possession of a firearm.CitationTODD v DOW (Son With A Gun) 19 CA4 253 [See: Tarasoff v Regents 17 C3 425] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||