|
0257 While being trained to participate in the sport of horse-jumping, plaintiff was not actually participating in the sport and, since her instructor owed her a duty of reasonable care, her negligence action against the instructor was not barred by primary assumption of the risk, but plaintiff's voluntary encounter with the risk might have been a secondary assumption of the risk for the jury to consider as part of its comparative fault analysis in apportioning liability.CitationGALARDI v SEAHORSE (A/R Horse Jumping) 16 CA4 817 [See: Knight v Jewett 3 C4 296]
|
|
