- Home
- Bios
- Try Us Free
- Subscribe
- Case Library
- CA Evidence
Discovery
Civ-Pro - Torts
- SLAPPS
- Text Summaries
- Search
- Support
Case Summary |
|
0254 A social acquaintance who introduced plaintiff to an investment counselor did not owe plaintiff a duty to investigate or advise plaintiff regarding the competency of the counselor or the soundness of investments plaintiff made through the counselor.CitationVIOLETTE v SHOUP (Non-Agent's Duty) 16 CA4 611. |
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||